What do you Think? Identical Twins?
Rachel Maddow
Chris Hayes
The many physical and psychological similarities between Maddow and Hayes have much to do with the provocative Tweet Ann Coulter wrote today in response to Chris Hayes’ reluctance to define our fallen troops as heroes.
For those who don’t know who this little dork is, Chris Hayes is a tiny Talking Head on MSNBC, not one of their big names, more in the Left-wing junior league. Hayes, another no-talented nobody, went out of his way over the Memorial Day weekend to denigrate the heroic sacrifices of our military men and women. And Ms. Ann Coulter quickly shot back with her very killing sniper’s wit.
Ann’s Tweet was as follows:
Chris Hayes ‘Uncomfortable’ Calling Fallen Military ‘Heroes’ – Marines respond by protecting his right to menstruate.
Ann’s obvious insinuation here is that Chrissie Hayes has somehow misplaced or perhaps was never endowed with the sexual accoutrements usually assigned to the male gender. But in this day and age of a public progressive culture so a-gush in gender fluidity and estrogen overload, would Ms. Hayes really find Ann’s epithet insulting? Would he not, to the contrary, experience Coulter’s cut as quite politically affirming?
We all know that the progressive cultural agenda seeks to create a race of neutered ‘males’ all driving around in their Priuses and Volts and proudly proclaiming the superiority of an estrogen-fueled future. These New Age eunuchs pledge allegiance to the pseudo-matriarchal PMS-powered form of gender politics. For the devoutly progressive males of America, the quintessential compliment is being compared to a distinctive area of the female anatomy.
So don’t be surprised if some day soon you see this self-effacing slogan forever enshrined in the progressive almanac of sainted sayings:
Candy-Ass Pussy and Proud Of It!
Now, that would make one heck of a great bumper sticker, don’t you think?
Advertisements
He gives me the willies…not literally, mind you. Just something so tres ewwwwwww about him.
They are not twins, they are the same person. Rachel is the masculine version of Chris Hayes, a seperate personallity but the same person. He or she does one show, then changes clothes and violla, new host. Problem is they are both liberal, hate filled Dems who spew nothing but lies and poison. They are a disgrace to the media who has done enough to disgrace itself in the last couple of years.
Interesting theory, but nah, Chris doesn’t have half of Rachel’s charm.
or testosterone.
And then there’s Madcow herself. Sometimes I feel a special need for self-flagellation; turn her on the tube and I’m cured.
Yes, I would definitely say that watching Maddow would be a dose of S/M light.
I always thought epithets like “mangina” were a little harsh. I’ve now rethought my position on that. 🙂
Sad to say, I think that label fits the progressive male quite well.
The question might have been, “Identical Twits?”
Oh, good one, Artie.
Hayes is a libtard sycophant.
Agreed.
I thought he was Queenly. I see, his wife if for show.
Men like him give new meaning to the word Drone.