The Land of Narnia: A C. S. Lewis Christmas

The children’s fantasy classic (and the adult’s as well), The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe by C. S. Lewis is a wonderful Yuletide adventure story.  And the best film presentation of Lewis’ Christian parable is not the Disney Hollywood version released in 2005, but rather the BBC television production which was made in 1988.

The BBC version is so very true to Lewis’ storytelling style and the children chosen for the parts of Peter, Susan, Edmund, and Lucy look and act like English middle-class public school kids circa 1939.  The low tech features of the BBC series add to its charm and provides an authentic feel to the time period portrayed—you really do get drawn into the setting and you get to experience the adventure in a much more personal way when you’re not blinded by endless special effects.  And yet despite its simplicity, or perhaps because of it, the film has such a magical quality which is apparent right from the opening credits.

I think Lewis would have been entranced by this BBC effort.  I sure was.

The Wisdom of C. S. Lewis:

  • A children’s story that can only be enjoyed by children is not a good children’s story in the slightest.

  • No book is really worth reading at the age of ten which is not equally – and often far more – worth reading at the age of fifty and beyond.

  • You can make anything by writing.

  • Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.

  • I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.

  • Atheism turns out to be too simple.  If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning.

  • You don’t have a soul.  You are a soul.  You have a body.

Posted in Media/Arts/Entertainment | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

At Christmas, Don’t Let the Atheistic Grinches Get You Down

As each Christmas season seems to get ever more mired in the cultural swamp of anti-Christian muck and madness, I thought I would offer a Christ-based philosophical treatise to counter the sadly snide and often aggressive apostasy that the unenlightened elites in our society appear hellbent on shoving down our parched theological throats.

Grinch in NYC

Christmas time in America has turned into the season of angry atheistic assaults on Christian beliefs and long-held traditions.  From the desecration of church manger scenes to the spit-in-their-faces facade of a giant billboard in Times Square, the march against ‘myths’ seems ever on the move.  Ain’t it amazing though that these spoiled spawns of Western Civilization, these godless crusaders living off the bountiful capital created by 1,500 years of a Christian-based culture, would thumb their noses at the very source of their abundant wealth?

But not all upwardly mobile men and women have become enamored of the atheistic trendiness of today.  There may be a mocking billboard hulking over downtown New York City, but there’s also another banner that is being quietly raised across this bustling metropolis of Anything Goes.

Here’s a glimpse of the religious counter-revolution that is wearing away at the intellectual underpinnings of the academic atheism of our modern age.  Godless hedonism, with its crashing waves of meaninglessness, relativity, and foundation-less freedom may be pounding away at us with all its foam-flecked cacophony, but it is the deep deep currents flowing beneath our societal sea that will carry us into the future.

Timothy Keller is the founding pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York City.  This church was founded in the late 1980s and started out with about 50 members.  It now boasts over 5,000 members spread across three church locations in the Big Apple.  Redeemer’s approach to the Gospels has attracted young professionals seeking to embrace both the emotional and the intellectual rigors of religious faith.  This is an orthodox congregation, there are no electronic bells and whistles nor feel-good grandstanding from the pulpit.  Keller is the author of The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism and other publications.

Posted in Political/Social, Religion and Spirituality | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

A Winter Solstice Contemplation

The Winter Solstice is a time for celebration but also a time for reflection.  And since my Celtic and Germanic heritage has offered me both a pagan and a Judeo-Christian foundation of faith, I offer up a few ecumenical thoughts to ponder.

Ecclesiastes 3

To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:

A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted;

A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up;

A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance;

A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;

A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away;

A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;

A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.

He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.

Every man should eat and drink, and enjoy the good of all his labour, it is the gift of God.

That which hath been is now; and that which is to be hath already been; and God requireth that which is past.

All go unto one place; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again.

Posted in Religion and Spirituality | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The NRA and the Gun Control Debate

How many more atrocities will need to occur in our country before all our 2nd Amendment crusaders out there get an effective offense up and running?  Instead of playing endless defense when it comes to our right to bear arms, how about recognizing that a problem really does exist when it comes to the availability of guns in America and then actually develop ways to face the issue head on?  Then perhaps we could save the lives of potential victims of gun violence and not be caught with our pants down each and every damn time some pathetic nut goes off on a rampage.

Hand Gun

If the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the gun manufacturers want to create some political inroads with the American public and actually help to prevent catastrophes like the one at Sandy Hook, then why the hell haven’t they faced head on the frighteningly for real downside to the availability of guns in America?

The NRA has posted the following statement on their website: The NRA is prepared to offer meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again.  Well, with all the money that this organization spends on lobbying activities (and that goes for the gun manufacturers too) it apparently has never dawned on these geniuses until now that confronting the consequences of gun violence in America just might be a more effective way to ensure their continued right to access and own firearms.

Again, we see a glaring example of the insular dumbness and lack of cultural sophistication that marks conservative America.  We’re perpetually circling the wagons and hunkering down believing that the right politicians will somehow save our bacon.  And we look to the latest stats on gun ownership in the USA to lull ourselves into complacency as the figures go up.  But it only takes a Sandy Hook Elementary School horror to blow all that silly blather right out of the water.

So for all you hunkered-down wagon-circlers out there, here’s the latest Gallup poll hot off the presses post Sandy Hook.  As we all know, waiting with bated breath for the aftermath polls is another conservative fear-reactive fact of life.   Based on what Gallup is showing below, you can all breathe a little sigh of relief—-for now anyway.

Gallup Poll--Gun Violence

Posted in Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Punishing Psychiatrists for the Crimes of their Patients

Psychiatry--PeanutsIt would appear that the French courts are taking a very hard-line when it comes to the dodgy therapeutic outcomes of the psychological services.  Perhaps here in America we should also begin to ponder a better approach to the accountability factor for the psychiatric Brahmins of the mental health profession, especially considering that some of their scary ‘clients’ are out and about murdering children.

A French psychiatrist whose patient hacked an elderly man to death was found guilty of manslaughter on Tuesday in a groundbreaking case that could affect the way patients are treated.

A court in Marseilles said Daniele Canarelli, 58, had committed a “grave error” by failing to recognize the public danger posed by Joel Gaillard, her patient of four years.

Gaillard hacked to death 80-year-old Germain Trabuc with an axe in March 2004 in Gap, in the Alps region of southeastern France, 20 days after fleeing a consultation with Canarelli at Marseilles’s Edouard Toulouse hospital.

Canarelli was handed a one-year prison sentence and ordered to pay 8,500 euros to the victim’s children, in the first case of its kind in France. Defense lawyers said the ruling would have serious repercussions for treatment of the mentally ill.

But the kicker to this news story is that the murderer was found not responsible for his actions and has been released under medical supervision.

So a nut case can hack to death an elderly man but continue merrily along with his demented existence absolutely free as a bird flitting here and there among the general public while legally stoned out of his axe-wielding mind.  Ah, those Frenchies—they’ve turned judicial schizophrenia into a mind-bending art form.

Well, let’s hope that Monsieur Gaillard continues to take his daily medications, for somehow I don’t think the reassuring blurb about ‘medical supervision’ extends to 24-hour man-to-man coverage.

Posted in Medicine/Healthcare, Political/Social | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

To Succeed in Politics, Write a Good Story

Jane AustenIt’s time for us conservatives to focus in on the individual grassroots contributors to our cause and begin to provide support and recognition  for those women and men who are cutting through the thick twisted undergrowth of our Left-wing dominated culture.

To that end, let me introduce Jami from Conservative Fiction.  In her blog post entitled Political Lessons from Writing: People First, she offers a literary lesson on the presidential election that every Republican and conservative should take to heart.

Both sides were telling a story. In Obama’s story, the hero was Everyman, the ordinary folks of the special interest groups: the woman who could not get birth control, the young illegal immigrant who’d been brought here as a baby and could not get citizenship, the college student who just needed a chance.

In Romney’s story, the hero was, er, fiscal responsibility? Sometimes Romney?  It was hard to tell. For the most part Romney was telling a plot-driven story, and those kinds of stories often do not invite sequels.

In other words, whether in a book or in a political campaign, it is the character-driven story that strikes the strongest chord with the reader or with the voter.  And every good story has its heroes and its villains.  In this past political go-round, the super stars, as framed by the Left, were the victims of a cold, male-dominated conspiracy to crush the downtrodden.

Say what you will about Sandra Fluke, she was a real person. There were girls who empathized with her, and who were influenced by her story….Obama himself, the black child of a single mother, which is today’s equivalent of the son of a poor sharecropper…Michelle Obama, playing the role of the virtuous wife…..The Voter, as a savior of all those social programs for Americans.

And the Villains of this 2012 election season were easily type-casted for stock character roles in this liberal epic saga of good versus evil and Jami is right on target with the bumbling boobs and slimy Snidely Whiplashes that she has picked for their political parts.

  • Republicans Richard Mourdock and Todd Akin with boneheaded public statements that were easily twisted to be anti-woman.

  • Occasional comments by Romney which were slanted to imply he did not care about the poor, making him the clueless Marie Antoinette.

  • The desiccated political corpses of Karl Rove and George Bush were dragged from their graves and paraded through the streets again.

A clever and incisive perspective on the out-of-step and out-of-focus approaches that have mired the Republican party in a no-win and always defensive posture.  Note also, that what Jami is talking about here is the proactive shaping of our cultural narratives.

And it’s in the realm of entertainment where conservatives have a golden opportunity to put forward the heroes and villains of our own worldview.

The publishing field is a great example of an opportunity just waiting for the right takers.  And I’m not talking about the next blockbusters from Mark Levine, Ann Coulter, or David Limbaugh.  No.  It’s in the realm of fiction where true cultural/political power lies.  The book industry today offers fiction writers a dream come true—with all the self-publishing options out there, no one needs to stand at the guarded gates of Left-wing corporations in order to be seen, heard, and read.

Conservatives need to get creative in every medium.  For if not now, when???

Posted in Media/Arts/Entertainment, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gun Control or Psychotropic Pill Control?

A Jim Goad take on the gun control caterwauling in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings.

Before all the blood had time to dry, pro-government zombie toady scribes were shrieking for more “gun control” and insisting that “something” must be done NOW. They trotted out the tired meme that the “gun lobby” is very powerful and has a lot of money behind it—as if the government they dutifully worship doesn’t have far more power and money than the NRA.  One went so far as to proclaim that “no person in the United States of America should own a gun, unless they’re a police officer or a soldier.” And of course, “white men” were blamed, albeit by one white man after the next.

Pills

Goad cites the mounds of multiple psychotropic drugs found in the systems of so many of these mass murdering maniacs.  All those anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, anti-psychotic, and anti-obsessive crazy concoctions that Big Pharma and the Psychiatry profession push and pump into the systems of the neurotic and the mentally ill, such as: Fluvoxamine, Prozac, Paxil, Mirtazapine, Trazodone, Temazepam, Lexapro, Ambien, Xanax, and Vicodin.

But all prescribed apparently to no avail when it comes to the still-at-large and running free killing freaks of America.  Or could it be that these pharmacologic mixtures that attempt to regulate the human mind are the possible cause of these calamities?

Maybe those who claim they’re earnestly seeking an answer to Friday’s bloodbath should focus less on Gunsville and more on Pillsville. But right on the heels of their howling about NO GUNS came cries for MORE PSYCHIATRY. I don’t expect these remnants of 1960s ethics to ever blame drugs for anything. But what puzzles me is their new-found blind support of government. How did they turn from being the harshest critics of “The Man” in the 1960s to being his most brainwashed advocates today?

Jim’s puzzled as to why the Baby Boomer radicals of the 1960s should now embrace government at every go.  Gosh Jim, the answer to your query is obvious—the government is now run by the Baby Boomer radicals and their progressive spawn.  As is the media and the universities.  They are ‘The Man’.

But back to the topic at hand…let us also not forget all the frivolous DMS diagnoses and the Pharma pills that go with them, used for every twitch, every eye blink, every burp, and every ‘disruptive’ behavior that any little kid in America could possibly indulge in during school hours—it’s a medicated madhouse out there!

And yet, we still have dangerously disturbed creatures walking among us with easy access to firearms.  What to do?

Well, here’s a thought….Perhaps it’s time to rethink institutionalization before rethinking the 2nd amendment to our Constitution.

Again and again, we hear the same saga—parents attempting to get some kind of help for their disturbed offspring but to no avail.  Help, as currently defined by the psychiatric profession, seems to be the sum total of a quick trip to CVS to get a high cost prescription filled after a 50-minute $250 visit to Doctor DMS.  Ka-ching!

Why does America always bounce from one extreme to another?  Right through the 1970s, we institutionalized almost everybody and their mother.  It only took the word of a relative to get some poor schmo locked away in the local booby hatch indefinitely.  Today, we have slid to the other end of the mental health spectrum, leaving frightened family members and John and Jane Q Public at the non-existent mercy of the mad mental machinations of a demented son or daughter.

But of course, don’t expect any open-ended discussion as to the causes and possible solutions to this horrific madness.  The agenda here is gun control. And since us conservatives don’t think culture is that important and therefore have only a faint voice in America’s media, we will spend our time furiously playing defense, as usual.

When the Left owns the stadium, officiates at the game, and sets the rule of play, the Right can only whine and whinge at how unfair life has become in this post-Reagan America.

Posted in Medicine/Healthcare, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments

The Unbearable Stupidity of Conservatives—The Mayberry Syndrome

Barney Fife and Gomer PyleHave you ever scratched your head in total bewilderment over the state of American society today?  Have you ever wondered what the hell happened out there in the good ole USA while you were busy making those mortgage payments and raising those kids?   Well, look no further than the blog post over at Human Events to get an answer to your plaintive query.

John Hayward of Human Events (Powerful Conservative Voices), in a post he entitled Buying Into the Culture War, has dramatically, if unwittingly, given us the core reason for all the daunting dilemmas that our country is facing today.  As you will see from his blog post, Mr. Hayward shows us that when it comes to understanding the conundrum of culture, Conservatives are Complete Idiots.

Glenn Reynolds makes an interesting suggestion to Republican donors in the New York Post today: instead of pouring cash into ineffective old-school political advertising during campaign season, they should use their millions to “buy some women’s magazines… or at least some women’s Web sites.”

This is one of numerous suggestions made in the wake of the 2012 election, sharing the common theme of encouraging Republicans to make long-term investments in cultural capital, rather than frantic last-minute margin calls on political capital.  Others have encouraged the financing of more conservative publishing, Internet, television, and cinematic ventures.  It won’t be easy to recapture this cultural territory from the Left – it took them decades to establish their near-monopoly on cultural media space – but if the efforts are launched immediately, they could bear some fruit by 2016.

It’s very difficult to re-define the terms of such an engagement in just a few short months, especially since so much of the “news” media is energetically working for the other side.  Politicizing culture sometimes seems repulsive or unfair to conservatives. We need to get over that, because the other side does it every day, in countless ways.

Politicizing culture seems repulsive or unfair to conservatives….well, there you have it in a nutshell, folks—Conservative Stupidity on full display.

It’s really embarrassing to read such pathetically naive gibberish.  It’s like listening to a grown man telling us that babies should really come from the stork, but now that those evil liberals have sullied the birth experience by indulging in sexual intercourse, we better get in the game pronto before we’re totally extinct.

Apparently, Mr Hayward believes that culture is some sort of pure and sacred entity totally divorced from the direct intervention of human experience.  It would seem that those powerful conservative voices over at Human Events have never stuck their noses in a history book.  One wonders where Hayward and his cohorts have gotten their education, and where, pray tell, they have been sticking their silly heads these past few decades.

Well, for the culturally challenged (which seems to be the depth and breadth of our conservative leadership), here is a mini remedial tutorial on the ins and outs of that mysterious human cult called culture.

Definition: Culture is the learned patterns of behavior and thought that help a group adapt to its surroundings.  Culture consists of values, beliefs, mores, underlying assumptions, attitudes, and behaviors all shared by a group of people.

Gee, shared beliefs, values, and attitudes—like the ones that decide whether the electorate feels there should be abortion on demand, whether the government should pay for birth control, and whether the definition of traditional marriage should be revamped.  In other words, the dominating beliefs, values, and attitudes of our society, OUR CULTURE, drive people’s political orientations.  I think even Gomer Pyle and Barney Fife would be able to grasp the connection here.

Some of the Major Drivers of Culture Include:

  • Media—News and Journalistic editing, TV programming, films, publishing, etc.

  • Educational Institutions—Primary, secondary, university philosophical underpinnings through expressed through curriculum and teachers.

  • Government/Politics—Laws, administrative policies, constitutional interpretations through the judiciary, taxation policy, use of police and military, number and size of government agencies and their power and employment.

  • Corporations—business products and policies, marketing tactics, grants and donations to political parties and non-profits, etc.

  • Science and Technology—think birth control pill, computers, Internet, smart phones, medical breakthroughs that extend lifespans, and the use of ‘scientific’ research to prop up political agendas.

  • Demographics—Population stats and age ranges, immigration/relocation (from outside US and within US), birth rates, economic stratification,

  • Economic Opportunities—the matching of skills to jobs, entrepreneurial expansion, the level of affluence, inflation/deflation, etc.

The Republican party and the conservative movement have played predominately in one, and only one, cultural sandbox, leaving many of the other cultural drivers to the not-so-fickle fates and their Left-wing puppet masters.

But challenging the dominant liberal culture can only be launched upon the strong back of a thriving and well-organized conservative sub-culture.  Our alternative political news media and blogs on the Internet, and the occasional conservative essay-type Bestseller that hits the market, are a good start, but only a start.  We need to dominate the world of fiction, in publishing, in TV comedies and dramas, and in the Hollywood film industry.  In other words, we need to shape and direct the social narrative within the entertainment field.

Example: Note the not so subtle portrayal of conservative values from the hit TV series of the 1980s, Family Ties.  The character of Alex Keaton, played by Michael J. Fox, turned the Reagan years into one long-running spoof of traditional American values.  The genuine values as presented in this sitcom that all good-minded Americans are expected to espouse are those of Alex’s parents, the liberal duo who represent the cool married couple working for public television and doing a little feminist freelance architecture.  Well, we might have won the White House for three terms running back in those days, but as this clip shows, we sure as hell didn’t win the future.

And Education is another driver that is so so ripe for winning right now.  Take the time to read Nathan Harden’s article at American Interest entitled The End of the University as We Know It to get a clear idea of what’s coming down the pike for the university of tomorrow.  Will conservatives be positioned to take advantage of these changes or will we continue to be sitting in the bleachers bellyaching about the progressive propaganda game?

As the Soviet tanks of socialism have been rolling across America for years on end, conservatives have been busy living out their separate lives all within the imaginary bubble of Mayberry where we just whistle our happy snappy reassuring tune and the big bad liberal world magically melts away.  Yes, it seems some citizens of Mayberry may be awakening from their self-induced delusions, but just in case there are a few Gomers and Barneys out there who didn’t get the gist of my message, I’ll put it all into just three simple words:

Culture is Political

Posted in Education/Campus, Media/Arts/Entertainment, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Conservatives Discover Cultural Warfare—Better Late Than Never, I Guess

CavemanWhen I see articles like the one below, I keep trying to ignore the sad fact that in just a few short weeks it will be the year 2013.   But kudos anyway to the handful of conservative pundits who seem to have gotten a few of their brain cells to percolate.  I guess finally discovering the obvious is better than more endless blather about the next political campaign.

The old adage goes, “Don’t get mad, get even.” For a select few Americans, that principle could be amended to “Don’t get mad at your enemies, buy them.” I have sometimes thought that if I were Charles Koch, instead of trying to influence American politics honestly, I would do it the way the Democrats do: I would buy the New York Times. With a current market capitalization of $1.23 billion, the New York Times Co. would hardly put a dent in Koch’s net worth.

But Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit has a better idea.  Not only is Glenn’s proposal more cost-effective, it would allow Mr. Koch to associate with a better class of people:

- Glenn’s suggestion: Buy some women’s magazines.  No, really.  Or at least some women’s Web sites.  The thing is, those magazines and Web sites see themselves, pretty consciously, as a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.  So while nine out of 10 articles may be the usual stuff on sex, diet and shopping, the 10th will always be either soft p.r. for the Democrats or soft — or sometimes not-so-soft — hits on Republicans.

Ah, the great minds of the conservative movement!  To not only grasp that culture matters but to also brilliantly leap to the next logical conclusion that one must go where the voter lives in order to get the message across.  Wow!  What intelligence!  What genius!  Could it be that conservative cultural retardation is actually curable???  Could we be witnessing the most spectacular moment in our constitutional history when conservatives become—gasp!—CULTURAL PLAYERS???

Don’t bloody bank on it.  They’re now all hunched over their laptops waiting for the Koch brothers to single-handedly save us.

But when dealing with the dimwitted, patience is ever required.  I’m sure that by the time we lose the next election, our conservative ‘intelligentsia’ will have miraculously discovered the power of fiction, film, and TV programming on the malleable minds of the voters.  So get ready to pat our mentally challenged chieftains on the back and to award them yet another gold star to be prominently placed in the blank pages of their cultural copybook.

Posted in Media/Arts/Entertainment, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Masculine Women and Feminine Men

Which is the Rooster and Which is the Hen

Hip flasks, flappers, shingled hair, speakeasies, and jazz.  A booming economy, technical and medical breakthroughs, and women running wild.

Absolutely love the fashions of the 1920s—the slinky long waisted chemise-like dresses, the bobbed and permed hair, and those adorable cloche hats.  Women looked emancipated yet soft and feminine, while men looked gentlemanly tough whether wearing top hats, tweeds, or their Oxford bags.  And all that anything goes cultural craziness—the bizarre and forbidden becoming the fashionable and chic.

But of course, some folks always have to push the boat out just a little too far, a little too fast.  Challenges to standard norms and expectations can at times be innovative and trend-setting, while at other points in history, the out-and-out disparagement of tradition brings only backlash, resentment, and fear.

By 1932, the realities of a crashing stock market, deflation, and mass unemployment brought the roaring 1920s and all its free love exhilaration to a screeching halt.  Those flaunted, hip, and popular perversions were pushed right back into the cultural wardrobe with a loud bang of the closet door.

Posted in Lesbian/Gay, Political/Social | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The Cause of Homosexuality: More ‘Scientific’ Hogwash

genesNow that the ridiculous ‘scientific’ declaration that homosexuality is strictly genetically determined—an article of faith fiercely held by the adherents of white homosexual privilege—has landed in the dust heap of faux facts, we are now presented with another ‘it ain’t their fault’ fallacy.  Yep, yet another government-funded research project to uncover the politically correct cause of gayness.

Take a gander at the latest bit of politically driven, queer-pandering bullshit masquerading as ‘science’.  These academic bozos claim to have unlocked the puzzle of why people turn out gay.

Scientists may have finally solved the puzzle of what makes a person gay, and how it is passed from parents to their children.  A group of scientists suggested Tuesday that homosexuals get that trait from their opposite-sex parents: A lesbian will almost always get the trait from her father, while a gay man will get the trait from his mother.

Scientists from the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis say homosexuality seems to have an epigenetic, not a genetic link.  Long thought to have some sort of hereditary link, a group of scientists suggested Tuesday that homosexuality is linked to epi-marks — extra layers of information that control how certain genes are expressed.

These epi-marks protect fathers and mothers from excess or under exposure to testosterone — when they carry over to opposite-sex offspring, it can cause the masculinization of females or the feminization of males which can lead to a child becoming gay.  These markers are “highly variable” and that only strong epi-marks will result in a homosexual offspring.

Evolutionarily speaking, if homosexuality was solely a genetic trait, scientists would expect the trait to eventually disappear because homosexuals wouldn’t be expected to reproduce.

Let me offer up a few observations and queries in regard to the hypothesis put forth here by these oh so learned progressive ones at the University of California.  And feel free to add your own thoughts to this discussion.

  1. The study seems to confuse gender identity with sexual orientation—note the masculinization of females and the feminization of males jargon.  Are there lesbians and gay men who struggle with gender issues?  Indeed there are.  But I would venture to say that the majority of lesbians and gay men don’t, at least not the gay men and women I have ever known in my life.  If you want to indulge in stereotypes here, then how about all those very femme lesbians out there in the real world?  And what about all those very butch gay men? And how about those gay men and women who would never identify themselves as either butch or femme?  And most dykes and gay men are unrecognizable as such by virtue of appearance or affect.  So if these scientific goobers at UC have discovered anything, it might be a possible cause of gender confusion, but it sure as hell ain’t the cause of homosexuality.

  2. If homosexuality is caused by epi-marks as claimed, then how does one explain the ‘awareness’ phenomenon?  Is there some type of dormancy period involved with these epi-marks for those women and men who come out as gay later in life?  And what about those folks who leave the gay lifestyle to embrace heterosexuality?  Did their gay epi-marks suddenly just fade away?  Were the gay epi-marks of late bloomers somehow psychologically cloaked or denied by them?  And if one can psychologically deny their sexual orientation for decades on end, then doesn’t that imply that homosexuality, at least in some cases, can be ‘overcome’?

  3. How about those lesbians who forcefully state that their homosexuality is a CHOICE?  How about those celebrity and activist dykes like Camille Paglia, Cynthia Nixon, Anne Heche, Kate Kendell, Jackie Black, Roberta Sklar?  Are these women deluding themselves about the root cause of their sexual orientation?  Are we to tag these gals as bisexual by nature to make the homosexual lobby happy or do we just run them out of our community on a rail, writing them off as self-haters?  Isn’t that the usual response by the Gay Inquisition?

  4. And how about bisexuality?  Do these pesky epi-marks turn on and off?  Do bisexual men and women get a conflicting dose of masculinization and feminization from their fathers and mothers that makes them prone to both heterosexual and homosexual behavior?  Gee, sounds a bit bi-wildering to me.

  5. Sexual orientation, and the gay marriage and school indoctrination programs that go along with this tainted tolerance movement, is a controversial political football.  Any so-called study today MUST find in favor of the social/political agenda of Gay, Inc. or the researchers involved will be hounded from their positions, lose their livelihoods, and get slandered as homophobic haters. Welcome to America’s Middle Ages, where the Church of Progressivism uses its own brand of witch hunts and persecutions to silence dissenters.

  6. How interesting that the findings of this ‘research’ are released just when there are a couple of gay-related cases coming before the Supreme Court.  How positively coincidental!

  7. This ‘study’ was conducted at the University of California, an institution that would rather create high-paying ‘diversity’ positions on their campus than offer decently paid fellowships to cancer researchers.

As Ruth Ann would say:  And That’s the Truth!
(a noisy Raspberry implied)

Posted in Lesbian/Gay, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Union Goons Attack Reporter in Michigan

Steven Crowder, a Fox News contributor and conservative activist, found himself on the receiving end of union violence and spittle-enhanced obscenities yesterday during demonstrations in Lansing, Michigan.  The assault and battery on Crowder and the violent acts committed against others were all playfully described by the mainstream media as a boisterous day in the state capital (Brian Williams, NBC News).

Taking a Punch for Freedom

Posted in Business/Economy, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

A Salute to Frank Sinatra: That’s Life, Baby

Oh, Frankie!
A Salute to a Real Man

Frank Sinatra
December 12, 1915 – May 14, 1998

If anyone knew about the ups and downs, the highs and lows of living life, Sinatra sure did.  From a scrawny little punk out of Hoboken, New Jersey to a tough enterprising competitor in music, film, and television, Ol’ Blue Eyes held sway over the American public through 6 decades.  And Francis Albert Sinatra took crap from no one—he’d bust our namby pamby politically correct world wide open.  Happy Birthday, Frank.

Posted in Media/Arts/Entertainment | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Sexually Transmitted Diseases Running Rampant in NYC

STDsMayor Bloomberg, that paternalistic political hack who believes he has been anointed by the secular gods of Progressivism to police the food choices of his childlike citizens, might want to turn his divine attention away from the soft targets of snacks and sodas and spend just a little bit of time dealing with the real hardcore public health issues impacting New York City.  But of course, that would mean courageously confronting the fatal personal choices made by many minorities and gay men, and of course, it would also mean taking on the cannibalizing liberal culture that supports and sustains sexually promiscuous and irresponsible lifestyles.

While Bloomers has been busy bossing all and sundry over the size of their sodas and the fat content in their restaurant dishes, the rate of sexually transmitted diseases in many zip codes throughout New York City has been skyrocketing.  HIV/Aids, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Hepatitis B are the dirty disease-ridden worms eating away at the core of the Big Apple.

A study by the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene has found that large parts of the city are plagued with soaring rates for multiple STDs – including HIV/AIDS.

The study said 33 percent of all the ZIP codes in New York City were in the top quintile citywide for multiple sexually-transmitted diseases during a survey taken in 2010.  Among the most severe examples is ZIP code 10474 in Hunts Point, the Bronx, where rates of hepatitis C, chlamydia, gonorrhea and HIV/AIDS all ranked in the top 20 percent of all New York City ZIP codes.  CBS New York

As the progressive establishment continues to indulge their pity party for these sad, helpless, and forever victims of the evil capitalist patriarchy—the favorite pastime for those morally superior pharisees of the Left—the real cause of this sexually self-destructive behavior is ignored and denied.

Sex as recreation is killing us.  We have become a culture of infected cunts and cocks.  And as long as we treat personal responsibility as some quaint curiosity from the Victorian era that we can all laugh at and disregard, our country will continue to slide down this slimy slope of sexual degradation and disease.

Posted in Lesbian/Gay, Medicine/Healthcare, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Gender Gerrymandering: The War Against Boys

If you would like to get a frightening glimpse into our feminist future then simply take a gander at what is happening in the progressively grotesque paradise known as Sweden.  For in this very cold and politically calculating Scandinavian landscape, any poor sod ever daring to publicly portray those gender-based heretical behaviors that come so naturally to most little boys and girls is in for a whole lot of heavy-handed governmental guff.

This estrogen-laden land of the once feared and mighty Viking has launched a cultural slash-and-burn crusade on their own home shores in a concerted effort to decree a gender-free utopia.  Breaking away from the evil enslavement of oppressive pronouns, smashing through that stilted style of a he and she society, Sweden has dared to boldly go where no man—oops—where no one has gone before: to that godless netherworld of generic genitalia.

War on BoysPojkar är Förbjudna!

Swedes can be remarkably thorough in their pursuit of gender parity. A few years ago, a feminist political party proposed a law requiring men to sit while urinating—less messy and more equal. In 2004, the leader of the Sweden’s Left Party Feminist Council, Gudrun Schyman, proposed a “man tax”—a special tariff to be levied on men to pay for all the violence and mayhem wrought by their sex.

In April 2012, following the celebration of International Women’s Day, the Swedes formally introduced the genderless pronoun “hen” to be used in place of he and she (han and hon).

Egalia, a new state-sponsored pre-school in Stockholm, is dedicated to the total obliteration of the male and female distinction. There are no boys and girls at Egalia—just “friends” and “buddies.” Classic fairy tales like Cinderella and Snow White have been replaced by tales of two male giraffes who parent abandoned crocodile eggs.

The Swedish Green Party would like Egalia to be the norm: It has suggested placing gender watchdogs in all of the nation’s preschools. “Egalia gives [children] a fantastic opportunity to be whoever they want to be,” says one excited teacher. (It is probably necessary to add that this is not an Orwellian satire, this school actually exists.)   The Atlantic—You Can Give a Boy a Doll

Gender Watchdogs.  Oh yes, indeed.  Because as we all know, it’s not about the fantastic opportunity to be whoever we want to be.  It‘s about the harsh enforcement upon a passive population of a delusional twilight world awash in perpetual penis envy.

The Outcast episode from Star Trek: The Next Generation, which was obviously produced to make a pro-homosexual plea to the American nation in the early 1990s, provides a nice narrative about our progressive masters.  Oh how the bleeding liberal heart of 20 years ago has hardened!  All that tolerance and compassion, now in the 21st century, has become nothing more than congealed Marxist-socialist muck.  All hail Collectivism!

Note that Star Trek’s notion of a genderless society is composed entirely of female eunuchs—there ain’t nobody here who even remotely resembles a male.  Get the message, boys?

Posted in Lesbian/Gay, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Remembering Pearl Harbor

December 7, 1941

Pearl Harbor7USS Arizona

Pearl Harbor1USS Casin and USS Downes

Pearl Harbor2USS  West Virginia

Pearl Harbor3USS  Arizona

Pearl Harbor4Destroyed US Planes

Pearl Harbor6US Submarine Base

Pearl Harbor5Civilians Killed 8 miles from Pearl Harbor

Pearl Harbor8USS California

Pearly Harbor9Shot Down Japanese Plane

Pearl Harbor10USS Shaw

Pearl Harbor11USS Maryland and USS Oklahoma (capsized)

Pearl Harbor12Navy Wives Head for Cover

71 Years Ago Today:

9 US Ships Sunk
21 US Ships Severely Damaged
2,402 Dead (1,177 from the USS Arizona)
1,282 Wounded
29 Japanese Planes Shot Down

Posted in Political/Social | Tagged | Leave a comment

Sandra Fluke Auctioned Off for 400 Bucks

What would you pay for an ‘intimate’ hour with Sandra Fluke?  What bang for your buck do you think you’d get from 60 enthralling online minutes in the presence of this cossetted concubine of the progressive socialist movement?

Fluking

Certainly, Ms. Fluke’s years of slaving away to earn her daily bread would provide an hour’s worth of wonder….oops, wait a minute, she’s never actually worked a hard day in her spoiled and very privileged 30-year life.  Ok, well then it must surely be her glowing years of selfless service to the downtrodden and poor, offering up her numinous talents to improve the lives of others….oops, wrong again.  Now wait a minute here—surely this Democrat dame has done something with her snooty white middle-class life that would justify auctioning off an hour of Fluke’s time to the genetically gullible.

The auction for a private one-hour online “strategy session” with women’s rights activist Sandra Fluke ended two days early because the auctioneer, a charitable website BiddingForGood, deemed some responses to the auction as unacceptably “harassing.”

“We had a wonderful opportunity to make Sandra Fluke available for a consulting session with the highest bidder in this auction, but unfortunately, due to a disturbingly high number of harassing responses to this item, we have decided to close the auction two days early,” BiddingForGood said in a special note on the webpage for the auction.   Daily Caller

Oh, I get it!  Sandy baby is a women’s rights activist.  She’s a middle-class white woman who is so so oppressed by virtue of being female in the cruel cruel patriarchal world of 21st century America.  So I guess this ‘strategy’ session will provide the lucky winner with tips on how horny upscale females can fuck free of charge while brainstorming other clever ways that dependently promiscuous divas can enjoy their male meat without adding to the US population.  For ain’t that what the progressive agenda is really all about?

By the way, the big winner was a RosieR who bid $400 for the exulted privilege of sitting adoringly at the silly clay feet of Celebrity Sandy.

Posted in Political/Social | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Why We Lost the Election: It’s the Culture, Stupid!

AutopsyAs the after-defeat bumbling of the incompetent Republican clowns claiming to be our leaders continues apace, I offer up this piece of political observation by Laura Hollis which appeared on the Townhall website two days post election disaster.

For the most part, I am in agreement with Ms. Hollis’ post-mortem but I find it almost frightening that conservatives are only getting the current lay of America’s cultural land at this point in our history.  And while her analysis is pretty much on target, note that there is not even one suggestion concerning goals, strategies, or tactics to move us forward.

  1. We are Outnumbered.  We accurately foresaw the enthusiasm, the passion, the commitment, the determination, and the turnout.  It wasn’t enough….there are legitimately fewer Americans who desire a free republic with a free people than there are those who think the government should give them stuff.

  2. It wasn’t the Candidate(s).  No matter what tactic you could point to that Romney could have done better, it would have been spun in a way that was detrimental to his chances.  No matter who we ran this year, they would have lost.

  3. It’s the Culture, Stupid.  We have been trying to fight this battle every four years at the voting booth. It is long past time we admit that is not where the battle really is. We abdicated control of the culture – starting back in the 1960s. And now our largest primary social institutions – education, the media, Hollywood (entertainment) have become really nothing more than an assembly line for cranking out reliable little Leftists.  We are reaping what we have sown.

  4. America has become a Nation of Adolescents.  The real loser in this election was adulthood: Maturity and Responsibility. The understanding that liberty must be accompanied by self-restraint.

  5. Yes, there is a Vagina Vote.  Suffice it to say that the only “war on women” was the one waged by the Obama campaign, which sexualized and objectified women.   For a significant number of women, this was appealing.

  6. It’s not about Giving Up on Social Issues.  We do not hold the values we do because they garner votes.  We hold the values we do because we believe that they are time-tested principles without which a civilized, free and prosperous society is not possible.

  7. Obama doesn’t have a Mandate, but he doesn’t need one.  I have to laugh – bitterly – when I read conservative pundits trying to assure us that Obama “has to know” that he does not have a mandate, and so he will have to govern from the middle.  Obama does not care that he does not have a mandate. He views himself as having been re-elected to complete the “fundamental transformation” of America, the basic structure of which he despises.

  8. The Corrupt Media is the Enemy.  I have been watching the media try to throw elections since at least the early 1990s.  We saw the media cravenly cover up for the incompetence and deceit of this President, while demonizing a good, honorable and decent man with lies and smears.  Republicans, Libertarians and other conservatives need to be prepared to play hardball with the Pravda press from here on out.

  9. Small Businesses and Entrepreneurs will Hurt the Worse.  Obama’s statist agenda will unquestionably benefit the biggest corporations.  It will be the small business, the entrepreneur, and the first-time innovators who will be crushed by their inability to compete on a level playing field.

  10. America is More Polarized than ever and this time it’s Personal.  I’ve been following politics for a long time, and it feels different this time. Not just for me. I’ve received messages from other conservatives who are saying the same thing: there is little to no tolerance left out there for those who are bringing this country to its knees – even when they have been our friends.

  11. America just has to Hit Rock Bottom.  I truly believe that most Americans who voted for Obama have no idea what they are in for. Most simply believe him when he says that all he really wants is for the rich to pay “a little bit more.” So reasonable! Who could argue with that except a greedy racist?  What that means, I fear, is that they will not see what is coming until the whole thing collapses.

All of the above is so very well and good but to simply state what the causes of the problem may be is not in and of itself an actual solution.  Duh!  And that obvious bit of commonsense seems to be lost on conservative talking heads and the idiotic political hacks running things in the Republican party.

Yep, the media is stacked against us.  Yep, the universities indoctrinate students with Left-wing nonsense.  Yep, too many people are looking for a handout.  Yep, we get it.  Well, at least some of us get it.  But the query that continues to go unasked, let alone actually answered is: Where do we go from here? 

What is the bloody game plan?  If the media is the enemy, how will we strike off the hoary heads of this corrupt hydra and cripple its ability to control the entertainment industry, the publishing world, the news outlets?  If the battle isn’t in the voting booth but rather in the minds of the voting population than how do we dismantle the educational propaganda machine that holds sway over the mental and emotional attitudes of our children and young adults?

In other words, what the hell are the goals, the strategies, and the tactics for winning this cultural war and who the hell will be at the helm keeping us dead set on course?  Any takers?  Anyone???

Thanks to Michael for bringing Ms. Hollis’ article to my attention.

Posted in Political/Social | Tagged , , , , | 12 Comments

Palestinians and Arabs: The Left’s Middle East Muppets

Horror of Horrors—Jews Fighting Back!

As Steven Crowder so succinctly summed up in his video, the tag line for that silly bunch of self-deluded Left-wing penis pumpers quaintly known as Queers for Palestine is simply:

We’re Here, we’re Queer, we’re Dead! 

So all you good little gay boys who just love to prance around with your progressive hetero pals, make sure when visiting that vacation paradise of pre-historic Palestine, to wear your sexy nancy-assed chaps on arrival.  Cause these pathetic self-oppressed pricks are out to play one hell of a mean anti-queer S/M scene.  Have a fun time!

Posted in Lesbian/Gay, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The New York Times Discovers Republican Lesbians

Conservative lesbians really exist!  And how do I know?  Because the New York Times has just discovered us!  Like uncovering a rare species that flies in the face of the liberally defined political facts of life, the New York Times has tentatively exposed their Democrat devotees to a published presentation exhibiting those very contrary unicorns of the LGBT community: Republican Lesbians.

Although the Republican Party has long drawn gay men who believe in the party’s message of small government and a strong military, Republican lesbians are a rare political breed.

There is no way to measure the true numbers, but gay activists say that in many cases, these “unicorns” were Republicans before they were gay — driven by conservative upbringings, economic issues and libertarian principles.  They often did not acknowledge their sexual orientation, even to themselves, until middle age.  New York Times

For the most part, the women highlighted in Sarah Wheaton’s article all adhere to the same life scenario and don’t really reflect the full spectrum of conservative and libertarian lesbians. But the article is fair-minded and totally free of the usual snark and condescending commentary that typically ooze from this paper’s so very superior pages.

The comment section is well worth the read.  The absolute outrage vented toward the lesbians portrayed in the article, and also at the very concept of conservative women-loving-women, is a hoot and a half.  Ms. Wheaton’s article really shook up the puritanically progressive Holy Fathers and Mothers of the liberal establishment.

Click on the link to read the article, and if you’re of a mind, add your comment to the 300 plus already posted.  I added my two cents worth under the handle of Les Con.  Don’t let those anonymous ‘gay activists’ tell the world who we really are and what we’re all about.  Put your face forward and blow their Democratically demented minds.

And thanks to Paula for pointing out the article to me.

Posted in Lesbian/Gay, Political/Social | Tagged , , , | 12 Comments

The Plymouth Colony: America’s First Failed Socialist Experiment

Did you know that Thanksgiving is as much a celebration of down-and-dirty capitalism as it is a humble thank you to a glorious Providence for its gracious bounty?  As Jerry Bowyer’s op/ed piece in Forbes yesterday patiently explained, those earnest Pilgrims of Plymouth Colony had to learn the hard way that the best man-made ideologies don’t hold a candle to simple human nature.

So when you bite into that delicious turkey today and then cram your eyeballs with football, football, and more football, you might find a moment to ponder the infinite perfection of the best imperfect economic system ever devised by the natural inclinations of normal men and women.

The most historically significant North American colony was Plymouth Colony, founded in 1620 in Plymouth, Massachusetts.  The members of the Plymouth colony had arrived in the New World with a plan for collective property ownership. Reflecting the current opinion of the aristocratic class in the 1620s, their charter called for farmland to be worked communally and for the harvests to be shared.

You probably will not be surprised to hear that the colonists starved. Men were unwilling to work to feed someone else’s children. Women were unwilling to cook for other women’s husbands. Fields lay largely untilled and unplanted.  Famine came as soon as they ate through their provisions.  After famine came plague.  Half the colony died.

After 2 1/2 years, the leaders of the colony abandoned their socialist mandate and created a system which honored private property. The colony survived and thrived and the abundance which resulted was what was celebrated at that iconic Thanksgiving feast.

The charter of the Plymouth Colony reflected the most up-to-date economic, philosophical and religious thinking of the early 17th century. Plato was in vogue then, and Plato believed in central planning by intellectuals in the context of communal property, centralized state education, state centralized cultural offerings and communal family structure.  For Plato, it literally did take a village to raise a child.

This collectivist impulse reflected itself in various heretical offshoots of Protestant Christianity with names like The True Levelers, and the Diggers, mass movements of people who believed that property and income distinctions should be eliminated, that the wealthy should have their property expropriated and given to what we now call the 99%.  This kind of thinking was rife in the 1600s and is perhaps why the Pilgrim settlers settled for a charter which did not create a private property system.

The colonists threw off the statist intellectual fashions of their day.  They concluded that the ancient principles of private property as recorded in the Ten Commandments were superior to the utopian speculations of Plato and his 17th-century imitators. Human nature was a fact of life, self-centered, fallen.

Or in the words of William Bradford, Governor of Plymouth Colony and chronicler of the pilgrims who came to America looking not only for religious freedom but also looking to create a social paradise on earth by living their lives in accordance with the elite ideology of the day….

At length, after much debate of things, the Govr (with the advise of the cheefest amongest them) gave way that they should set corve every man for his owne perticuler, and in that regard trust to them selves; in all other things to goe on in the generall way as before.  And so assigned to every family a parcell of land, according to the proportion of their number for that end, only for present use (but made no devission for inheritance), and ranged all boys and youth under some familie. This had very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more torne was planted then other waise would have bene by any means the Govr or any other could use, and saved him a great deall of trouble, and gave farr better contente.

The women now wente willingly into the feild, and tooke their litle-ons with them to set torne, which before would aledg weaknes, and inabilitie; whom to have compelled would have bene thought great tiranie and oppression.

The experience that was had in this commone course and condition, tried sundrie years, and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanitie of that conceite of Platos and other ancients, applauded by some of later times; that the taking away of propertie, and bringing in communitie into a comone wealth, would make them happy and norishing; as if they were wiser then God.

For this comunitie (so farr as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much imployment that would have been to their benefite and comforte.  For the yong-men that were most able and fitte for labour and servise did repine that they should spend their time and streingth to worke for other mens wives and children, with out any recompence. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in devission of victails and cloaths, then he that was weake and not able to doe a quarter the other could; this was thought injuestice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalised in labours, and victails, cloaths, etc., with the meaner and yonger sorte, thought it some indignite and disrespect unto them. And for mens wives to be commanded to doe servise for other men, as dresing their meate, washing their cloaths, etc., they deemd it a kind of slaverie, neither could many husbands well brooke it.

Upon the poynte all being to have alike, and all to doe alike, they thought them selves in the like condition, and ove as good as another; and so, if it did not cut of those relations that God hath set amongest men, yet it did at least much diminish and take of the mutuall respects that should be preserved amongst them. And would have bene worse if they had been men of another condition.  Let pone objecte this is mens corruption, and nothing to the course it selfe. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in his wisdome saw another course fiter for them.  William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation (1623)

History can help us learn from the mistakes of the past but only if our history is shared and pondered with our progeny.  After all, civilization is based on the ability of succeeding generations to build on the wisdom of their forbears.

So gee, do you think the Obama generation is being taught the lessons of Plymouth Plantation in their anti-capitalist, multicultural curriculum?  Nah, we neither.

Posted in Education/Campus, Political/Social | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

A Thanksgiving Parable for the Politically Depressed

A Thanksgiving Parable

A Chinese man lived on the border of China and Mongolia. In that time, there were battles and wars between the two countries. This Chinese man had a beautiful mare. But one day, that mare jumped over the fence and went over the border into Mongolia. The Mongolians stole the horse. The Chinese man’s friends came to him to console him, “Oh what terrible news!” they said.” Why do you think it’s bad news?” the Chinese man asked.  “Maybe it’s a good thing.”

After a couple of days, the mare came back to the man, together with a stallion.  The friends came around again and said, “What great news!”  “Why do you think it’s good news?” the man asked.  “Maybe it’s bad news.”

Later, while the Chinese man’s son was riding the stallion in an attempt to tame him, he fell and broke his leg.  The friends came once again and said, “Oh what terrible news!” Again, the Chinese man said, “Why do you think it’s bad news?  Maybe it’s a good thing.”

After a week, another big war broke out between China and Mongolia.  A Chinese general came into the town and took all the young men with him to fight in the war.  And all those young men in the town died, except of course for the son of the philosophical Chinese gentleman—he couldn’t go to war because of his broken leg.

The Chinese man told his friends, “See?  The things you thought were bad were actually good, and the things you thought were good were really bad.”

As this Chinese gentleman so wisely perceived, the determination of any drama is not necessarily concluded in each of its unfolding scenes.

Life’s fickle events certainly shape and mold us.  But often we forget that we too do the shaping, not only of circumstances, but of our character and our destiny.  So let this holiday season be a time for fruitful introspection and let us choose to stand together upon the solid rock of thanksgiving.

May your Thursday turkey be dressed with the spirit of optimism and faith and may your paeans of gratitude be met with the blessings of courage and confidence.

Posted in Personal/Home, Political/Social | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Michael: A Conservative Profile

Who Are We?

This is Michael:

First the background – I am 50-ish white gay male, trained as a Licensed Clinical Social worker and in a domestic partnership  with a black man from Belize – when I tell people that I am a Reagan conservative they (mostly liberals – never conservatives)  just can’t seem to wrap their brains around that possibility  – and then proceed to tell me how the “Republicans” would never support me as a gay man.  As a gay conservative, I now find it very interesting that people in general have no problem with the “gay” part – but they do with the conservative part.

My partner of 10 years and I are very prominent in our community partly because of our extensive community involvement and opening of our home to charitable functions.  The majority of our closest friends are moderate to conservative and see us as transcending our gayness just the same as my partner transcends being black – we never deny these characteristics, they are just singular aspects of who we are.  I frequently tell people that we are “small g” gay versus Big G.  It’s possible that this makes it safer for them to embrace us – but embrace us they do.

We’ve had very conservative people say very positive things about us as a gay couple in very public forums.  Many in our community would tell you that we’ve done more to promote healthy and positive gay images to the community than any demanding activist ever has.  Winning hearts and minds comes from presenting ourselves as being more similar to our straight counterparts than not.  Often to their surprise, we are just like them in many ways.

I am constantly reminding my liberal friends that all of these social issues that are hills worth dying on for them will matter very little if we have a country bankrupt under the weight of the debt we are amassing.  They either don’t understand this issue or don’t care.  The piece that they fail to understand each time they sell themselves to the government for the next handout is that they lose freedom that will never return.  I believe strongly that we’ve reached a tipping point that is going to take a revolution to reset.  I pray that I am wrong.

Thanks, Michael.

And I would like to encourage everyone who visits TLC to feel free to contact me and share a little bit about themselves and their viewpoints.  I will publish your bio/comments on the main home page here, but of course, will only identify you in whatever way you feel comfortable.  Just click on the Contact Me tab and then fire away.

Come on now, add your own individual essence to our conservative mosaic.

Posted in BIOs, Lesbian/Gay, Political/Social | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Dan: A Conservative Profile

Who are we?  When we describe ourselves as conservative, when we use that defining word to offer to the world a summation of our personal political and social beliefs, just who are we declaring ourselves to be?

It seems that so many people, on both sides of the political spectrum, have a stereotypic view of just who a real conservative is supposed to be or at least should be.  For instance, how often have we heard the declaration that lesbians and gay men can’t be conservative by virtue of their sexual orientation?  And I would warrant that our conservative fold has many more such wrinkles in its complex fabric.

So I think it’s high time we got to know each other.  And to that end, I would like to invite you all, my fellow conservatives and other like-minded travelers, to tell us a little about yourselves and what you believe.  Your profile can be a few sentences, a paragraph or two, or as long as you want it.  Share whatever you feel is important to you.  I will post your bio on the home page here and I promise to edit sparingly.

And so first out of the shoot today is Dan.  Dan contacted me last week during the post-election communal plunge into the Slough of Despond.  He has given his permission to be the first in what I hope will be a series of informal conservative bios.

From Dan:

I found your site by accident, and I’m very glad I did.  A little about me: I’m male, 42, married, straight, 3 kids (2 girls, one boy) who are 11, 8 and 2 1/2.  My little one is a girl adopted from China.

I am an undisciplined Buddhist, I need to be better.  And I am a conservative.  Having made that introduction, I do not care who someone loves, or likes enough to have sex with.  I do not think biology dictates a person’s worth, I think what they do does.  I think the single most immoral thing one person can do to another is teach them to depend.

I think supporting someone based on race is as racist (intolerant) as opposing someone on race.  I think the same way about gender, sexuality, you name it.  If a person is a moral individual (as defined by Ayn Rand) and their level of healthy selflessness outweighs their unhealthy selfishness, I think that’s as good as it gets on this planet.

My best friends in the world are first my wife and second Stacy and Heather, a married lesbian couple.  Also conservatives.  I’m not sure if they’ve heard of your site, but they will.

I like to think my wife and I and Stacy and Heather represent the  re-branding of conservatism.  Simply put, be good to yourself, others, and make more of a contribution than you consume.  And anyone can bitch, but don’t give yourself permission to.  There are plenty of things for which to be grateful.

I think conservatives’ single biggest mistake currently is that they are abysmal at articulating the conservative position, which in turn gives liberals a wide open opportunity to control the narrative.  And that’s what it all comes down to: the narrative.

Clearly, articulating conservatism is more difficult than explaining liberalism.  For example, describing how to make a payroll is more challenging than saying Pay Your Fair Share, War on Women, Racism, etc.  So we need to get much, much better at articulating and we need to get much, much better forcing liberals to define their terms so they don’t get away with vagueness.  A liberal says Pay Your Fair Share, so ask them for a number—30%, 40%, 100%?  Ask if millionaires and billionaires apply only to individuals or groups as well.  Invariably, they will say groups too.  When they do, explain that hundreds of universities have enormous endowments and generate huge amounts through athletics.  Yet they have non-profit status that excludes them from taxes.  So I agree, they should pay their fair share.  (Harvard has a 1 billion dollar endowment!!! And it has been a liberal/socialist mill for decades).  Can we at least tax endowments over $50 million?

I have more thoughts, specifically on the election and its deleterious effect on people like us, both individually and our country as a whole.  I do think there is still light at the end of the tunnel. At any stage of opposition, liberals love for their opponents to become disheartened by perceptions of liberal inevitability—they think they’re morally infallible. Kind of like the Divine Right of Kings of the past.

Now is the most necessary time for a well-articulated counter narrative. And remember, the one most responsible for liberalism in this country won 4 terms!  4!  That was Roosevelt who vacated the White House only because he died.  It must have been unbelievably awful for people like us then.

Liberals quit because of all their excuses and their ill-defined fairness and emotion-driven lives.  I teach my kids that their brain is the donkey, their heart and stomach are the cart. Don’t reverse them, you aren’t liberals. Tell me your thoughts, not your feelings.  They are really starting to get it.

Yes, I could go on and on.  Thanks for your time.  And I’m very glad I found your site.

Thanks, Dan.

I would like to encourage folks who visit TLC to feel free to contact me and share a little bit about themselves and their viewpoints.  I will publish your bio/comments on the main home page, but of course, will only identify you in whatever way you feel comfortable.

Come on, add your biographical piece to the conservative mosaic.

Posted in BIOs, Lesbian/Gay, Political/Social | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Conservative Movement—A March to Nowhere?

The other day, Rush Limbaugh made the following comments about the presidential election on his radio program:

I really think that the solution to our problems is not really political.  I think conservatives are seen by young people and the Left and the pop culture the way they are not because of what these people have been taught about conservatism.  It’s purely cultural.

I must confess, I think the solution will be found in ideology, but I must confess, I think I’ve been a little wrong.  My only point here is I’m just scratching the surface on this, by the way, so I’m speaking off the top my head here, but I really think that the way this is going to have to be attacked and dealt with is not to set politics aside. I’m not saying that none of this is political, but it’s a cultural problem we face. The reason conservatives have been so maligned and are so maligned, the reason people who don’t know us think of us the way they do is not because they understand politics.  It’s a cultural thing.   Ace of Spades

My initial reaction to Limbaugh’s bumbling, stumbling remarks were, to put it succinctly, No Shit, Sherlock!

In the year of Our Lord 2012, Rush Limbaugh and other Mortimer Snerds of the conservative movement have finally come to the earth-shattering conclusion that the culture just might have something to do with why Romney lost the election and why our country is where it is today.  Wow!  What an awesome epiphany!  And keep in mind, folks, that Limbaugh makes millions and millions of American bucks to preach this kind of pathetic non-insight from his pompous radio pulpit.

The insular stupidity of conservative ‘leadership’ manifested by the egotistical bombast of the Rush Limbaughs of our conservative world, is glaringly front and center and conspicuously on display.

All through this election season, conservative Talking Heads did nothing but groan on and on endlessly about Ronald Reagan and 1980, comparing Obama to Jimmy Carter and hence showing just how frighteningly oblivious they were to the obvious fact that 30 plus years had come and gone since the Reagan revolution.  And surprise, surprise, in the 21st century, the American people have turned out to be a very different political animal indeed.

Guess what, boys and girls?  A few cultural changes have been going on during these past decades since Reagan took the White House.  Yep, decades.  My, my, how time flies, and yet our conservative ‘leadership’ still dreamily drifts along in their antique 1980 Gipper-mobile.

Well, a little reality check here for the perpetually ignorant know-it-alls.  During Reagan’s reign, while conservative Republicans were gleefully rubbing their hands together believing that victory was certainly their very own, the Left was exceedingly busy digging away in the cultural trenches, shaping the electoral mindset and laying the groundwork for a progressive coup d’etat.

During 1980-1981, I was working part-time for the Veterans Administration in an ongoing struggle to pay my college tuition.  The VA building where I worked had a large open floor plan with scores of desks lined up across the office, all occupied by dutiful VA employees shuffling through their daily paperwork while listening to ear-plugged transistor radios.

On the afternoon of Monday, March 30, 1981, the Veterans Administration erupted in shouts of jubilation as news of the assassination attempt against Ronald Reagan spread across the office floor.  VA employees cheered and clapped, some standing on their desks shouting for joy, Reagan’s been shot! Reagan’s been shot!  My supervisor, a Black gentleman, ordered one of my work colleagues to stop acting like a jackass and to climb down from his desk top.  He instructed all of us to get back to work and to remember that no matter how we had voted, the shooting of a President of the United States was no cause for celebration.

My supervisor’s little mini speech caused another supervisor on the floor, also a Black gentleman, to come running into our work unit yelling at my boss, repeating almost hysterically, What’s he ever done for us?!   What’s he ever done for us?!  My boss, a tough and very strict manager from the Old School, shrugged off this verbal assault and would have nothing to do with what he saw as an unseemly and despicable reaction to the shooting of a President.  And needless to say, there were moans and groans of fierce disappointment from my work companions when it became clear that Reagan had survived the attack.

This very troubling scenario took place at a federal government agency in 1981.  Gee, I wonder if any other anti-conservative, anti-American, anti-capitalist, and anti-Constitutional cultural crapola has managed to infiltrate our society since then?  Now let’s put on our thinking caps, kiddies, and see if we can puzzle out this complex conundrum.  After all, even the likes of Rush Limbaugh needed 31 years to come to the startling conclusion that something called culture just might, just might, have an overwhelming impact on politics.  Sweet Holy Mother of God, help us!

Conservatives have no one but themselves to blame for the devolution of our Republic. Too many conservatives have been monumentally stupid, smug, gutless, self-absorbed, and down right lazy, believing all they ever had to do to preserve our liberties was show up at the polls to cast a vote for the Right guy or gal.

Over these past decades, we have lost a voice in major media outlets.  We have lost a voice in academia.  And we are losing the primary and secondary school systems to boot.  Yet STILL much if not most of conservative strategy, effort, and time continues to focus solely on the next election and the next candidate.  Even the great patriotic awakening of 2009 that gave birth to the Tea Party movement is almost exclusively mired down in the mud of election politics.

When will it collectively dawn on our ‘leadership’, that if the fate of our Republic hangs by a thread on the outcome of one damn election, then we have already lost the cultural soul of our country.  And if we’ve lost the cultural spirit of America, WE CAN’T WIN ELECTIONS.

So, as Mr. Limbaugh et. al. gaze with wonderment at their bulbous belly buttons pondering the next campaign and the next quick and easy political fix to what is and always has been a long-term cultural disease, we better start looking for new and aggressive conservative leadership and we better start looking NOW.

Posted in Political/Social | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments